The Memo That Could Turn the Tide Against Planned Parenthood Tax Funding
by Martin Barillas Sunday, March 27, 2011
Subject: The Memo That Could Turn the Tide Against Planned Parenthood Tax Funding
Date: March 27, 2011
Timing is Critical - Act NOW!!!
It is urgent that this coming week you contact your U.S. Representative http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW_by_State.shtml and two U.S. Senators
and urge them to vote to defund Planned Parenthood in any upcoming Continuing Resolution bill(s).
Planned Parenthood, which according to their own former physician Dr. George Langmyhr, was in the abortion business long before Roe v. Wade legalized baby killing, has been feeding from the public trough for far too long.
Keep your message short: No tax funds for Planned Parenthood. Provide them with this link to the Memo site: http://uscl.info/edoc/doc.php?doc_id=49&action=inline.
The Jaffe/Berelson Memo
The infamous Jaffe/Berlelson Memo from Planned Parenthood Vice President Frederick S. Jaffe to Bernard Berelson, President of Rockefeller’s Population Council describes various means of population control including increasing homosexuality and compulsory abortion and sterilization. The Memo was first made public in 1970 by the U.S. Coalition for Life.
The Memo was taken from “A Family Planning Perspectives Special Supplement” published by Planned Parenthood-World Population. A copy of the Memo in its original format is available (free) from the USCL Research Library at the above link. Make sure your Representative and Senators get a copy of the Memo.
The Significance of the Jaffe/Berelson Memo
The Jaffe/Berelson Memo was drawn up by Jaffe as a companion piece to Berelson’s paper, “Beyond Family Planning,” published in the Population Council’s February 1969 issue of Studies in Family Planning http://uscl.info/edoc/doc.php?doc_id=83&action=inline .
According to Berelson, federal family planning programs are “the first step to population control.” Why? Berelson answers, “Probably because from a broad political standpoint it is the most acceptable one: since closely tied to maternal and child care it can be perceived as a health measure beyond dispute; and since voluntary it can be justified as a contribution to the effective personal freedom of individual couples.”
Is Berelson saying that Congress was duped into supporting Title X birth limitation programs in 1970 under the guise of maternal health care and volunteerism, when in fact, Congress was taking its first step toward population control, which unlike “family planning” includes a wide range of compulsory means of population reduction including compulsory abortion and sterilization and social constraints such as “encouraging increased homosexuality?”
If federal “family planning” programs are indeed stepping stones to totalitarian population control by the State, then it is time, indeed, that Uncle Sam got himself out of the birth limitation business. Cutting Planned Parenthood funding is an excellent first step toward this goal.
Memorandum to Bernard Berelson (President, Population Council) found in "Activities Relevant to the Study of Population Policy for the U.S." 3/11/69 by Frederick S. Jaffe (Vice President of Planned Parenthood - World Population)
TABLE 1. Examples of Proposed Measures to Reduce U.S. Fertility, by Universality or Selectivity of Impact
a) Postpone or avoid marriage
b) Alter image of ideal family size
Compulsory education of children
Encourage increased homosexuality
Educate for family limitation
Fertility control agents in water supply
Encourage women to work
Selective Impact Depending on Socio-Economic Status
Modify tax policies:
a) Substantial marriage tax
b) Child Tax
c) Tax married more than single
d) Remove parents tax exemption
d) Additional taxes on parents with more than I or 2 children in school
Reduce/eliminate paid maternity leave or benefits
Reduce/eliminate children's or family allowances
Bonuses for delayed marriage and greater child-spacing
Pensions for women of 45 with less than N children
Eliminate Welfare payments after first 2 children
Require women to work and provide few child care facilities Limit/eliminate public-financed medical care, scholarships, housing, loans and subsidies to families with more than N children.
Measures Predicated on Existing Motivation to Prevent Unwanted Pregnancies
Compulsory abortion of out-of-wedlock pregnancies
Compulsory sterilization of all who have two children except for a few who would be allowed three
Confine childbearing to only a limited number of adults
Stock certificate type permits for children
a) Discouragement of private home ownership
b) Stop awarding public housing based on family size
Payments to encourage sterilization
Payments to encourage contraception
Payments to encourage abortion
Abortion and sterilization on demand
Allow certain contraceptives to be distributed nonmedically
Improve contraceptive technology
Make contraception truly available and accessible to all
Improve maternal health care, with family planning a core element
Source: “A Family Planning Perspectives
Special Supplement” published by
Planned Parenthood-World Population NYC, NY, 1970
Read More Press Releases
Wiwigo Technologies: First of its kind selfie campaign takes place in moving Delhi-Chandigarh Shatabdi
Get press releases by email